Transparent Conductor Markets; ITO Remains Dominant....

NanoMarkets has released a new report, "Indium Tin Oxide and Alternative Transparent Conductor Markets". The following is an excerpt from the report.

The transparent conductor industry is dominated by a single material-indium tin oxide (ITO). Manufacturers of flat panel displays (the largest users of ITO) have relied on this material for years but have always griped about ITO's inability to meet their requirements. When used as a conductor, ITO is not very conductive, and as a transparent layer, it is not very transparent. Beyond this fundamental shortcoming is the fact that ITO is generally difficult and expensive to apply as a thin film of sufficient quality. Once it is applied, it is brittle, and therefore can easily wear out or crack when used in applications where bending is involved. The price for this mediocre performance is quite high, since ITO is dependent on indium, which has been priced at $350 to $1,000 for the last several years.

ITO's many faults would seem to create a ripe environment for competition-new transparent conductor materials offering improved performance in the areas where ITO falls short, and different methods of using and applying ITO to address these issues.

[More]

Innovation in Thin-Film Silicon PV

NanoMarkets has just released a new report on thin-film silicon photovoltaics. See here for details.

Amorphous silicon (a-Si), a type of thin-film photovoltaic (PV) technology, is experiencing a dramatic growth curve worldwide and offers a compelling business opportunity in power generation, building- integrated solutions and consumer applications. Thin-film PV solutions are the most rapidly growing portion of the PV landscape with approximately 23 percent of the overall PV market in 2008 and a-Si represents the largest component at over 50 percent of the overall TFPV market production in 2008. Amorphous silicon is well positioned to become low-cost PV solution of choice for many applications in the eight-year time frame covered in this report. Lower cost per kWh is the main driver for the shift from crystalline silicon PV to thin-film PV, as well as the increasing acceptance of a-Si thin-film PV for new applications. Cost, product maturity, excellent reliability, and availability of product in high volume are all reasons a-Si has become the most popular of the thin-film technologies; other TFPV technologies include CIS/CIGS and organic PV, which have product maturity issues, and CdTe, which suffers from government regulatory issues at end of life disposal/recycling.

The economics of all photovoltaics involve a high upfront cost to pay for the solar panels, but free feedstock in the form of light from the sun and relatively low operating costs because of the relatively low, periodic maintenance costs compared to traditional methods of power generation. The PV technology that is able to provide the quickest path to lowering these upfront costs and deliver product in high volume is likely to become the dominant PV solution. Amorphous silicon thin-film PV is well positioned to be the PV solution that can provide both large volumes quickly and a roadmap to low cost faster than competing TFPV technologies.

Amorphous silicon solar cells were introduced initially in the late 1980s, with expectations that they would dominate the PV market and be competitive with fossil fuels by the mid-1990s. This did not come to pass as the efficiency was less than 5 percent and initial cell reliability was less than 10 years. These drawbacks coupled with the pullback in fossil fuel prices in the late 1980s, off of peaks in the early 1980s, eliminated almost all demand for a-Si PV except in low-cost/low-power applications such as solar calculators, watches, etc.

Despite a lack of large-scale commercial applications, research continued on a-Si, which resulted in a much better understanding of a-Si PV physics. This research resulted in the development of tandem a-Si/Si:Ge alloy and a-Si/µc-Si cells that had efficiencies nearing 10 percent and field reliability of over 20 years. This positioned the a-Si PV to capture market share when renewed interest in PV energy emerged in the early 2000s.

Several events occurred starting in the early 2000s that accelerated the adoption of PV in general and that of a-Si in particular. First was the spike in fossil fuel costs that increased interest in all PV solutions. With this increased interest, the PV demand exceeded supply. Because crystalline silicon dominated the market, the increased need for silicon combined with the robust demand for silicon in the semiconductor industry caused silicon prices to skyrocket and resulted in a silicon shortage. These high prices spurred companies to invest in capital to expand capacity for a-Si (<2 percent silicon consumption of c-Si) and CdTe-based thin-film PV, as well as accelerated research and development into CIGS and organic PV. Fortunately for a-Si, the renewed interest in PV solutions happened at the same time the industry was transitioning to tandem and multi-junction architectures with much more attractive overall efficiency and reliability than the single-junction designs, which were the dominant products available in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

In addition to the demand for alternative energy sources strictly due to cost of fossil fuels, the global warming/climate change movement helped drive demand for PV solutions as they have a zero carbon footprint. Government subsidies for PV solutions (especially in Germany and Spain where such subsidies can be viewed as either jump starting the PV industry or distorting the marketplace, depending on your point of view) have made it economically feasible to build large PV arrays. Amorphous silicon is very competitive for these applications and this has created demand for more capacity.

By the end of the period covered by this report, the roadmap for thin-film silicon PV cells will most likely transition from the a-Si/µc-Si cells, which are now becoming the mainstream a-Si product, to tandem-junction cells that most likely will be tandem- or triple- junction cells based on combinations of amorphous silicon, microcrystalline silicon and nanocrystalline silicon. The roadmap by the end of the reporting period will see the introduction of silicon-based quantum dots or silicon nanowire-based architectures ramping to high-volume manufacturing. This a-Si PV materials roadmap predicted in this report provides a path to 15-16 percent cell efficiency leveraging the cheap SiH4 as a feedstock, no changes to the TCO or reflector materials (although there are certainly improvements in materials processing that can improve efficiency), and most likely will use much of the equipment infrastructure of the current tandem cell factories that are currently coming on line. This reuse of capital equipment and infrastructure represents an excellent value proposition to constantly increase efficiency, aggressively driving down costs, while not being saddled with heavy capital costs to improve efficiency with the exception of those to satisfy increased capacity.

Another Thought On Start-Ups

An interesting blog entry caught my eye this morning on the impact of start-ups on jobs and by default, industry. (see here) The author points out that start-ups are not the panecea for economic growth (or by default, recovery) given their inefficient use of capital and other resources and how government involvement will spur a rush of companies into a segment that simply cannot support them.

That's not to say that start-ups are not a viable concept by any means but when we consider all of the money that has been thrown at printed, organic and thin-film electronics markets by government agencies, just how far have we collectively come?

As an aside, last month we were approached by a company who would be classified as a start-up that was looking for assistance in advancing their manufacturing operations. They were going to be relying upon an EU grant in order to become the next "(name deleted)". The market doesn't need another company to offer the technology but regardless, the firm was in line for several million Euros so why not take the chance? After all, it isn't as if the business has to succeed......

Especially when the bids are shall we say, rigged?

OPERA Organic Electronics Entrepreneur Training Day and Venture Forum

Passing this on......

The OPERA Organic Electronics Entrepreneur Training Day and Venture Forum May 18-19 2009 at the Novotel Brussels Centre Tour Noire in Brussels, Belgium. Organised by the EU-funded project OPERA, which aims to strengthen the position of Europe in the field of organic electronics, especially start-ups and SMEs.

Organic Electronics Entrepreneur Training Day
The objective is to enroll a maximum of 10 individuals or small teams with a preliminary business idea that they want to evaluate and develop further. In the morning we will have two real-life business case presentations and a presentation of what is required from a good business plan. In the afternoon the participants will work on their own ideas in small workshop settings. Workshops are facilitated by experienced mentors. The objective of the workshops is to produce a refined, business-plan-like version of each business idea plus a set of concrete action points to continue the process.

Note: Registration is complimentary, there is no participation fee.

Organic Electronics Venture Forum
The OPERA Venture Forum will bring together ventures seeking new capital and private capital firms seeking investment opportunities. The objective is to enroll 15-20 presenting companies to present their business cases in front of 15-20 VCs. Start-ups are encouraged to participate although early stage companies are welcome. Presenting companies can represent any part of OLAE value chain - from materials to commercial applications.

Note: there is no participation fee for presenting companies.

Details: http://opera-project.eu/index.php?id=13&lang=EN.

Contact: victoria.plompen@Plastic-electronics.org

Who Will Lead?

Interesting article in today's Wall Street Journal about the role of entrepreneurs in getting the economy back on sound footing. You can debate the merits of the proposals but one thing that sticks out is the need for technology, investment and leadership to come to the forefront.

We believe that materials, manufacturing and product innovation will be crucial elements of the story.

More Entries

BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.004. Contact Blog Owner